Abstract
We propose the use of the minimum variance portfolio as weighting method in a strategy benchmark for pension funds performance in Mexico. By performing three discrete event simulations with daily data from January 2002 to May 2013, we test this benchmark’s weighting method against the Max Sharpe ratio one and a linear combination of both benchmarks (minimum variance and Max Sharpe). With the Sharpe ratio, the Jensen’s alpha significance test and the Huberman and Kandel’ (1987) spanning test, we found that the three benchmarks have a statistically equal performance. By using Bailey’s (1992) risk exposure, market representativeness and turnover benchmark quality criteria, we found that the min variance is preferable for the publicly traded Mexican defined contribution pension funds.
© 2018, Facultad de Contaduría y Administración, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. All rights reserved. Publication of the article implies full assignment of property rights (copyright) in Journal of Contaduría y Administración. The publication mreserves the right to total or partial reproduction of the work in other print, electronic or any other alternative means, but always recognizing its responsibility.
License for Published Content
Unless otherwise stated, all contents of the electronic edition of the journal are distributed under a license and distribution "Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International" (CC-by). You can see from here the version of the license information. This circumstance must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Metadata License
The metadata of papers published by Contaduría y Administración are in the public domain, through the publisher's waiver of all rights to the work under copyright law worldwide, including all rights and related rights, to the extent permitted by law. You may copy, modify, and distribute the metadata, even for commercial purposes, without requesting permission.
